|
THIS EVENT IS NOW ARCHIVED
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Time: 12 noon (EDT) / 9 am (PDT) / 5 pm (BST)
The US Supreme Court’s decision in KSR v Teleflex has the potential to change US patent practice fundamentally. Will the Court’s rejection of the Federal Circuit’s rigid test for obviousness make it easier to challenge patents? Will it lead to litigation becoming less predictable? And will it make it harder for applicants to get patents granted at the USPTO?
MIP editor James Nurton will chair a panel of lawyers and in-house counsel who will discuss the issues raised in the KSR case and the impact they will have on patent owners, litigants, the courts and the USPTO. This web seminar will be essential for anyone who owns, applies for or challenges patents in the US.
 |
James Nurton
Editor, MIP
www.managingip.com |
 |
Katherine Lutton
Principal & Head of National Litigation Practice,
Fish & Richardson P.C. |
| |
 |
John Dragseth
Principal, Fish & Richardson P.C. |
 |
Kevin H. Rhodes
Assistant Chief Intellectual Property Counsel
3M |
| |
|
|
|
 |
Rick Frenkel
Director, Intellectual Property - Consumer & Emerging Technologies
Cisco Systems, Inc. |
|
|
Login and listen to the on-demand recording
System Check
http://www.brighttalk.com/systemtest.php
|